Fail Quotes

Started by Travis Retriever, October 17, 2009, 03:00:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Dammit Samuel L. Jackson, why did you have to do this?

[yt]og35U0d6WKY[/yt]


Ok, I keep getting the "the First Libertarians were socialist!" thing. Is there any validity to this?
"The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
Lao Tzu

Quote from: R.E.H.W.R. on September 28, 2012, 02:16:28 PM
Ok, I keep getting the "the First Libertarians were socialist!" thing. Is there any validity to this?

no, not really.

the first roots of this ideology dates back to well before socialism was even thought of in Europe
Meh

Quote from: Ibrahim90 on September 28, 2012, 03:45:45 PM
no, not really.

the first roots of this ideology dates back to well before socialism was even thought of in Europe

Ithink they are talking about the term libertarian.
"The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
Lao Tzu

Quote from: D on September 28, 2012, 06:09:16 AM
Dammit Samuel L. Jackson, why did you have to do this?

[yt]og35U0d6WKY[/yt]

[yt]PhV9aZOqmz8[/yt]
Good thing we have Nick Gillespie.
"The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
Lao Tzu

"Pretty bold of you to call someone a coward Dave. Maybe you could post one more real wrestling post." - My uncle Mike.

>Call Paul Krugman a coward for not accepting Murphy's debate challenge
>Get stupid comment making fun of the fact that I like pro wrestling

Distractions. Distractions everywhere.

Quote from: R.E.H.W.R. on September 28, 2012, 05:28:37 PM
Ithink they are talking about the term libertarian.

well, from the way the quote was posted, it gives the impression that it was about the people or ideology of the people called "Libertarians".

Meh

Quote from: R.E.H.W.R. on September 28, 2012, 05:28:37 PM
Ithink they are talking about the term libertarian.

Well then:

"1789, "one who holds the doctrine of free will" (opposed to necessitarian), from liberty (q.v.) on model of unitarian, etc. Political sense of "person advocating liberty in thought and conduct" is from 1878. As an adjective by 1882. U.S. Libertarian Party founded in Colorado, 1971." (source: Online Etymology Dictionary)

Quote from: Ibrahim90 on September 28, 2012, 08:15:52 PM
well, from the way the quote was posted, it gives the impression that it was about the people or ideology of the people called "Libertarians".

Maybe I worded it wrong.
"The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
Lao Tzu

Quote from: D on September 28, 2012, 06:09:16 AM
Dammit Samuel L. Jackson, why did you have to do this?

[yt]og35U0d6WKY[/yt]

Dude acts to get paid, yo. Oh, and he totally supports Obama. That too.

Idiots like this guy give Libertarians a bad name, per Independent Political Report
http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2012/09/four-candidates-confirmed-for-free-and-equal-presidential-debate/#comments
Quote

Look I understand you want independents, I do too. Virgil Goode is a much better candidate than Mitt Romney and I voted for and donated to Ron Paul. But let's face facts. Even though Mitt Romney is a liberal moron with a weird religion, at least he was born in the USA, does not get on his knees to Mecca five times a day, and is not a Marxist Communist, which is more than I can say for our Kenyan tribal chief "president" Comrade Obongo.

If you care about the future of the White Race and our Nation this year we all have to vote Republican, otherwise in four years we will have an economy like Zimbabwe and Sharia law, and gangs of marauding Mexican and African savages will rape every White woman in the country over and over and over again.

First things first. Get rid of the illegal alien invader Obongo even though we are voting for a liberal moron Republican. Unite as Tea Party conservatives and with the help of Jesus in four or eight years elect a true leader such as Rand Paul, David Duke or Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Response I got on a different site concerning the election

My post
"Let's cut out the Fox News propaganda here. In 3.5 years, besides Obamacare, Barack Obama's most notable accomplishments have been
1. More raids on medical marijuana clinics than were conducted in all of Bush's 8 years (http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2011/10/10/obamas-multi-agency-war-on-medical-marijuana/)
2. More warrantless spying on American citizens than in all of Bush's 8 years (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/09/aclu-forces-government-to-reveal-skyrocketing-surveillance-stats/)
3. Expanding America's war in the Middle East, included an endless drone war in Pakistan that is only going to create further insurgents that hate us "for our freedoms" or whatever is politically expedient

The reason Romney is going to have his ass handed to him in November is that he isn't any different than Obama on any of those issues. How can anyone who implemented Obamacare at the state level say with a straight face that he'll do something about it? How can a guy who wants to increase the military budget despite ever increasing fears about our national debt pull in any real fiscal conservatives? Etc, etc.

The only two people in this election who were saying anything different were Ron Paul and Gary Johnson.
"

The response I got
QuoteHere in one post, you see the far left as it is.  Let's examine.

"Fox News".  Along with Dr. Limbaugh the favorite bogeyman of the far left.  You see, because of the backwards thinking of liberals, it is impossible for them to accept that thoughtful people simply examined an issue and came to a different conclusion.  No, all "right thinking" people agree with them, and those that disagree are somehow duped.

"Pot".  Buckley, Lowrey, Rand, I could go on listing conservatives who opposed drug prohibition.  One need not bother to list liberals who support it.  Because the issue has nothing to do with left or right.  Except to the extent that it is just another bad lifestyle decision that people make, and then ask the responsible to subsidize.

"Warrantless searches".  Umm, yes.  The Party of Segregation disrespects civil right.  Socialism is the opposite of freedom.  What a newsflash.

"War".  You see, to the liberal, "peace" is just another way of backward thining, and people who understand that peace is the absence of opposition to America, must be for "war".  Of course, as Dole told us, the 20th Century is the history of democrat wars.

"Ass handed to him".  You see, to the leftist, there is an strange desire to be "popular".  Of course, no one expects this election to be a blowout for either side.  In fact, 8 out of the last 10 elections have been very close.   But, it all goes back to the old Julia Child quote "But everybody I know voted for McGovern."  Yep.

In sum, to the liberal, with his (or more commonly her) backward thining, you just wish for something to be true, and then assume that those who understand that simple wishes are not a policy, are "evil".

Its sad, really.

Quote from: R.E.H.W.R. on September 28, 2012, 04:20:38 AM
[yt]TV4U_FDUI6M[/yt]

I spliced your podcast and Alfonzo's videos together. Mostly I was bored out my mind and needed something to do. You've pissed off the Neo-cons, Shane.

This one was all kinds of fail worthy.
"Shanedk, you ask how many times the U.S. has to "be able to invade the entire world"? How many times should your immune system be considered justified in attacking viruses? The U.S. does not start wars. Were it to quit opposing those who do, this entire globe would be in flames in short order."

Okay guys, I need some back up. I'm getting swarmed by Neo Cons who can't tell the difference between Liberals and Libertarians.
"The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
Lao Tzu

Governor Dannel Malloy brings in his fail by claiming infrastructure solves all economic problems.

[yt]zFLJTiB2zPg[/yt]

"You got to start telling the truth that the state UNDERinvested. That's why we lost jobs for 22 years in a row on a net basis. When you're not rebuilding your infrastructure and, quite frankly, when you're not expanding your infrastructure, you lose."