Fail Quotes

Started by Travis Retriever, October 17, 2009, 03:00:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
September 23, 2012, 02:09:21 PM #2280 Last Edit: September 23, 2012, 02:12:03 PM by VectorM
Quote from: R.E.H.W.R. on September 21, 2012, 04:32:20 PM
This one is just hilarious.
[yt]eSp2PpmQLC4[/yt]

Pretty sure this is a troll. He says we should ban things like black reflective paint  :D

Edit: OK, i am 100% sure this is sarcastic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSp2PpmQLC4&feature=player_detailpage#t=255s This is actually pretty brilliant  ;D



Quote from: VectorM on September 23, 2012, 02:09:21 PM
Pretty sure this is a troll. He says we should ban things like black reflective paint  :D

Edit: OK, i am 100% sure this is sarcastic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSp2PpmQLC4&feature=player_detailpage#t=255s This is actually pretty brilliant  ;D

I don't know, if you find the guys actual channel, he deleted this video, he's got some other videos that make the same points.
"The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
Lao Tzu

[yt]XD7M6ryvDMY[/yt]

Sure.
"The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
Lao Tzu

I swear, this may be the most savage thing I've ever read from a so called "civilized person."

A little back story first. A report was posted on the other forum I go to about a man who killed a woman because she didn't tell him until after they had sex that she had HIV and she gave it to him too. People in the thread were justifying the murder. I pointed out that revenge killing is not the answer. The response I got contains so much bullshit that you might want to put on some safety goggles. You have been warned:

QuoteA revenge killing is not equivalent to a non-revenge killing. If someone dooms you to die slowly and painfully, then you have been deeply and irrevocably wronged, and thus taking revenge on them is, even if only for you personally, absolutely justified. Who cares what the law has to say about it? I'd rather take action against my enemy than rely on the apparatus of the judiciary to deal with them in some soft, impersonal way, where a just conviction is not guaranteed in the first place thanks to loopholes, expensive lawyers, insufficient evidence, etc.

In this case, the woman basically doomed the man, and she was completely unprovoked (i.e. had absolutely no cause to wish death on him). The man, conversely, had been provoked to the highest degree. She had just ruined his life, utterly. So, the revenge killer is not 'as bad as' the woman. What she did was heinous. What he did was understandable.

Quote from: R.E.H.W.R. on September 23, 2012, 05:57:58 PM
I don't know, if you find the guys actual channel, he deleted this video, he's got some other videos that make the same points.

What is his real channel? This one has the above video and a bunch of gaming related stuff.

Quote from: VectorM on September 23, 2012, 07:12:38 PM
What is his real channel? This one has the above video and a bunch of gaming related stuff.

Killallguns
"The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
Lao Tzu

Quote from: D on September 23, 2012, 06:54:06 PM
I swear, this may be the most savage thing I've ever read from a so called "civilized person."

A little back story first. A report was posted on the other forum I go to about a man who killed a woman because she didn't tell him until after they had sex that she had HIV and she gave it to him too. People in the thread were justifying the murder. I pointed out that revenge killing is not the answer. The response I got contains so much bullshit that you might want to put on some safety goggles. You have been warned:

Is there any way he could have sued her?
"The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
Lao Tzu

Quote from: R.E.H.W.R. on September 23, 2012, 09:09:03 PM
Is there any way he could have sued her?

He could not only have sued her, but brought criminal charges against her as well.

Quote from: MrBogosity on September 23, 2012, 10:58:09 PM
He could not only have sued her, but brought criminal charges against her as well.

Out of curiosity, what would they charge her with?
"The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
Lao Tzu

Quote from: R.E.H.W.R. on September 23, 2012, 11:38:25 PM
Out of curiosity, what would they charge her with?

Some places have "criminal transmission" laws; she could also be charged with assault, substantial bodily harm, and even attempted murder.

"Back in the OT they were under "THE LAW" GOD did not play back in those days. Things like rape, murder were punishable by death. GOD told the Israelites not to intermarry with foreigners. Because they worshipped idols, practiced homosexuality, incest, sex with animals. Casting their newborn children into the fiery furnace as a sacrifice to their gods baal, & molech the fish god. We are under the period of grace and mercy through JESUS CHRIST. "

I laughed when I read this!
"The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
Lao Tzu

Quote from: D on September 23, 2012, 02:44:54 PM


considering he is clearly wasting his time, I think being in a factory would be an improvement.
Meh

September 24, 2012, 04:19:54 PM #2293 Last Edit: September 24, 2012, 04:31:35 PM by Ibrahim90
well I just found out why my Dad doesn't know what's going on: the person responsible keeps hiding news from him (i.e. Mom). I clearly need a way of speaking to him more often.

(in case you're wondering, I can't call him; phone only receives calls from outside the US and Canada, and He's in China atm on business. even when he ain't, he's in Kuwait. So I rely on mom to transport all news--apparently he missed the parts about why I'm looking for work, or that I'm still applying for graduate school. turns out he's pretty understanding.).
Meh

Pretty much both these threads:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=857
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=920

I think I just figured out what Atheism+ means: Atheism plus statist dogma.