Fail Quotes

[AnCap Dave]

[Dallas Wildman]

This man should referred to a psychiatrist.

[AnCap Dave]

This man should referred to a psychiatrist.

Or a bullet to the brain.

[Travis Retriever]

As I said on Facebook, stay classy, SJWs....

And speaking of failure, so I must be super bored and D levels of masochistic today, because I'm actually on Being Liberal's page on Facebook, commenting on their posts, seeing if I can get them to ban me.  Gotta love how they call anyone who disagrees with them, "trolls" kindly get over yourselves, guys...
My poor sanity. T_T

[AnCap Dave]

[AnCap Dave]

Everything posted by David Balluff.

[AdeptusHereticus]

Wow, the last two additions are gold ...
Internalized misogyny, really ? So, it really means whatever the fuck they want it to mean, as I often heard ... Please someone, tell me that some of her followers objected to that ...
And the David Balluf stuff ... Well, fuck logic I guess ...

[Dallas Wildman]

Or a bullet to the brain.

Oh come on dude, that's a little extreme.

[AnCap Dave]

Oh come on dude, that's a little extreme.

I'm speaking hypothetically. Of course when someone talks about killing a child, it does bring my blood to a boil, so you'll have to excuse my more extreme language.

[Travis Retriever]

Or a bullet to the brain.

>Implying she has a brain in the first place...

[Travis Retriever]

http://gender.wikia.com/wiki/Gender_Wiki
This.

[Travis Retriever]

So I found another furry anarchist (not an-cap, but not leftist either) and I shared Hawkeye's latest facebook post with him here:  https://www.facebook.com/tim.dyson.37/posts/999030983454651?fref=nf&pnref=story and got this fail of a response:

Another comment I got at the top was of him saying to me and Lucas:   "If either of you would like an audiobook of it, as it dismantles the premise entirely, just ask."
Wow.  Could not have missed the point any harder if he tried.  The only reason politicians can do what they do is because people still believe the system works  The fact that they're voting is proof of that.
And no.  If you lend support to a system, you get responsibility because you're giving them the guts to committ attrocities they'd have never have done, as Hawkeye gives an example of here:  http://lordthawkeye.deviantart.com/journal/Why-are-you-still-a-statist-219816956  So no, but "just read this book" is NOT going to refute that.  If Spooner had a passage in the book that refuted it, he can copy/paste it in word and give me a screenshot or something.  Otherwise, it's just a homework fallacy & appeal to authority.

Take away the belief in the state (the ideological state) and they're just a bunch of guys in uniforms getting the rest of us to fund their excessively long roleplaying game.
If everyone else in North Korea said, "Fuck you Kim Jung Un, we are not listening to you!" What is his fat underprivileged ass gonna do about it?  All control beyond the self is an illusion.

[Travis Retriever]

No, he did NOT refute anything.  He merely asserted fallacies without explaining why.  Nor were the goalposts moved.  Ever. The point was explained above.  It has not changed.
NOTHING in Hawkeye's post was a strawman.  That's what statists say.  That's what they ALL say.  The idea that we don't vote ergo we shouldn't complain IS something we're told time and time again.  I don't believe for a SECOND that he has argued with statists if he hasn't heard that argument from them.
Really, he reminds me of Miliant-Mike1:  both have read one too many books and debated too few statists.   And like these pillocks on the (now defunct) Mises Institute Forum who didn't know what the sodding gold standard was or how it worked. *facepalms*

[AdeptusHereticus]

He says that both arguments hinge on voting being effective ... Isn't it effective for people from the left and the right ? If you aggregate all the people who voted for Obama, I think there's a pretty good chance that what they got is what was expected, as an aggregate.
In top of that, there's an argument to be made that the system works entirely as intended because what allow them to get a majority that pushes policies in one direction is the fact that the system allows partisanship. Weren't that the case, there would be no reason for all the leftists to vote for one guy just to be sure that the rightwinger doesn't get in the white house. This last part is an intended result of the process. Every voter expect it due to the use of a majority. Apart from that, there are the people who complain because what was done was not 100% what they wanted, but if they were honest, they would not complain because they knew the system doesn't work that way : They counted on it in the first place !

[Travis Retriever]

Every comment left by Shane Nolan on this post of mine.