Fail Quotes

[R.E.H.W.R.]

[yt]yARo4eWhbDw[/yt]
I hate that my friends decide to send this guy to bug me.

[MrBogosity]

Can we just assume that every video Zo uploads is a fail and not bother posting it here?

[R.E.H.W.R.]

I suppose.

[dallen68]

Can we just assume that every video Zo uploads is a fail and not bother posting it here?

We could post a link to his channel, and call it "Fail Nation"? We could have a whole thing just devoted to that!

[tnu]

http://capitalismisfreedom.com/woman-jailed-indefinitely-feeding-bread-crows/

[Travis Retriever]

We could post a link to his channel, and call it "Fail Nation"? We could have a whole thing just devoted to that!

Because everything on his channel is a fail, here's Zo with Fail Nation:  https://www.youtube.com/user/machosauceproduction  And yeah, it had to be done.

[Travis Retriever]

The dipshit strikes again!

Aldark:  "Sure maths is great and all but the body is a bit more complicated then basic math. its needs something a little more advanced. I may be wrong 'in your opinion', but I believe your original post is only half correct, myself. Not wrong, just incomplete."

My response:  "Appeal to complication, and ignores the physics of it too.  Not just the math, but Thermodynamics too.  And no, I'm not dealing with "opinion" (which you'd know if you bothered to read that link).  I'm dealing with facts, arguments from first principle, empiricism, and well established physical laws (thermodynamics).  I've backed up my arguments with physics and math.  You've done nothing other than just baldly assert, appeal to (bogus) authority and appeal to complication.  If you have a study (a RCT one) demonstrating the truth of your claims, present it, until then, my point stands as firm and undisputed as ever.

Your body cannot violate the laws of thermodynamics just to spite/love you.  If you really believe it can, have a physicist specializing in thermodynamics have a look and measure the stuff to be certain so you both can win a Nobel Prize; or at least James Randi's Challenge.  But until then, stop wasting my time and yours.
I'm sick and tired of hearing from people who think they're special, unique, and beautiful snowflakes that not even the laws of physics apply. Stop making excuses."

Why oh, why did I ever choose to get back in touch with this fucktard?

And he came back, this time with 3 comments.  I think I hurt its wittle feeling.

Aldark: "I dont even care if you unblock me this time. I dont need some guy who [while I have shown respect to your side of the argument at every step, and agreed with it for the most part] just steps on what I have to say, belittles my opinion, and then blocks me when I wont completely agree with them. 'special snowflake' dictates that I am a person who believes I am different to others. You have misused that term because infact I know I am not. I merely have a different view on the topic. If you cant bring yourself to respect that, then I dont need you around."

*yawn* The opinion card.  And he acts like he was the one who made that decision.  I've been sending him hints about *that* for weeks now.  Took him long enough to get it.  And no, this isn't a matter of opinion, it is a matter of fact.  Is it really *that* hard for people to tell the difference?  If it is an opinion, it cannot be considered valid or invalid by definition.  Learn to crack open a dictionary once in a while, Aldark.  And yes, I do get indignant when people who call themselves my friends LIE to my fucking face and say, "BUT IT'S ONLY MY/YOUR OPINION!111" as if that somehow makes it better.  But he wouldn't know that because he's aren't an honest person.
Speaking of liars--I *did* put him on my DA block list and then immediately remove him so he wouldn't be watching me and only because I'm tired of waking up after a rough day and dragging my ass out of bed for the privilege of listening to him lie to me, while pulling the honor/bigger man/overreacting card on me every time I call bullshit on him.  And no, Aldark, I never blocked you from Skype or from Steam either (I did remove him from both though).

Aldark: "And youve deleted me from skype. the overreactions never stop with you."

What overreaction?  Not wanting to deal with his dishonesty early in the morning and sending him a hint that way?  Dude, I deleted you from Skype WEEKS ago.  You just noticed this now?  And yeah, honest, virtuous people get indignant when others lie and pull out bullshit like, "it's my opinion! I haz honorz" or something else equally bogus.  Get over yourself Aldark.

Aldark: "Taking things a little out of proportion there, once again. You tend to over react to my arguments quiet alot. Just something ive noticed lately. calling me names and all kinds of offencive things. seriously dude chill the fuck out. All I said was that I trust my doctors more then an article o nthe internet. theres no need to get your panties in a twist over it. I didnt even say you were wrong did I? Infact the complete opposite. Seriously, the fuck is wrong with you?"

There is something right with me:  I don't like liars who don't believe basic math and physics and try to weasel out of basic facts or who can't .  That's creationists levels of dishonest on his part.  You chill the fuck out dude.  Don't get all pissy with me just because you can't back up your claims with evidence, cad.

[tnu]

[MrBogosity]

I'm pretty sure that's tongue-in-cheek.

[BreadGod]

Hemant Mehta tries to sugar coat Common Core. Most everyone in the comments section agrees with him, not realizing just how bad Common Core really is. I tried to inject some reason into the comments section, but I gave up in frustration. And yet people wonder why I hate most atheists even though I'm an atheist myself.

[dallen68]

And he came back, this time with 3 comments.  I think I hurt its wittle feeling.

Aldark: "I dont even care if you unblock me this time. I dont need some guy who [while I have shown respect to your side of the argument at every step, and agreed with it for the most part] just steps on what I have to say, belittles my opinion, and then blocks me when I wont completely agree with them. 'special snowflake' dictates that I am a person who believes I am different to others. You have misused that term because infact I know I am not. I merely have a different view on the topic. If you cant bring yourself to respect that, then I dont need you around."

*yawn* The opinion card.  And he acts like he was the one who made that decision.  I've been sending him hints about *that* for weeks now.  Took him long enough to get it.  And no, this isn't a matter of opinion, it is a matter of fact.  Is it really *that* hard for people to tell the difference?  If it is an opinion, it cannot be considered valid or invalid by definition.  Learn to crack open a dictionary once in a while, Aldark.  And yes, I do get indignant when people who call themselves my friends LIE to my fucking face and say, "BUT IT'S ONLY MY/YOUR OPINION!111" as if that somehow makes it better.  But he wouldn't know that because he's aren't an honest person.
Speaking of liars--I *did* put him on my DA block list and then immediately remove him so he wouldn't be watching me and only because I'm tired of waking up after a rough day and dragging my ass out of bed for the privilege of listening to him lie to me, while pulling the honor/bigger man/overreacting card on me every time I call bullshit on him.  And no, Aldark, I never blocked you from Skype or from Steam either (I did remove him from both though).

Aldark: "And youve deleted me from skype. the overreactions never stop with you."

What overreaction?  Not wanting to deal with his dishonesty early in the morning and sending him a hint that way?  Dude, I deleted you from Skype WEEKS ago.  You just noticed this now?  And yeah, honest, virtuous people get indignant when others lie and pull out bullshit like, "it's my opinion! I haz honorz" or something else equally bogus.  Get over yourself Aldark.

Aldark: "Taking things a little out of proportion there, once again. You tend to over react to my arguments quiet alot. Just something ive noticed lately. calling me names and all kinds of offencive things. seriously dude chill the fuck out. All I said was that I trust my doctors more then an article o nthe internet. theres no need to get your panties in a twist over it. I didnt even say you were wrong did I? Infact the complete opposite. Seriously, the fuck is wrong with you?"

There is something right with me:  I don't like liars who don't believe basic math and physics and try to weasel out of basic facts or who can't .  That's creationists levels of dishonest on his part.  You chill the fuck out dude.  Don't get all pissy with me just because you can't back up your claims with evidence, cad.

If you can't deal with him as an adult, just ignore him. it doesn't matter what time of day it is: Either it is true, or not.

[Travis Retriever]

If you can't deal with him as an adult, just ignore him. it doesn't matter what time of day it is: Either it is true, or not.

I'm not being immature, I'm being indignant and rightly so.  I don't tolerate liars; especially when they're cowards and hypocrites about it.  Besides, I didn't post those replies to him and have been ignoring him since.  I figured I'd just vent it out here and forget about it as I've had enough of him.
Wanting a safe place to vent is the primary reason I *started* this massive thread in the first place.

[Travis Retriever]

I'm pretty sure that's tongue-in-cheek.

I sure hope so.

[tnu]

BTW- Scarcity is not a rich person with infinite desire whining about how he/she doesn't have more than they did the day before. That is so perfectly narcissistic and sociopathic and by all measures emblematic anarcho-capitalism and right-libertarianism.

When I pointed out that desire is infinate and resources are finite.


Oh God now this is just insane.

Rothbard is insane. He advocated selling children on the free market and allowing parents to starve their babies to death. Adam Smith's capitalism requires a government. Read the Wealth of Nations or any of his other treatises. I'm sure there's something in the Wiki that would pop right out at you. There are no capitalist theorists until Rothbard who make a claim for a stateless capitalism and even he had the good sense to be wary of calling it anarchism, because anarchism was hitherto a worker's rights movement.

[Ibrahim90]

@ tnu: that person clearly doesn't know the difference between descriptive and prescriptive statements...