Fav quotes

[MrBogosity]

http://www.cracked.com/article_18804_the-6-wrong-questions-men-love-to-ask-about-women.html
Especially #4.  Very well put, Christina.

Seems to me a lot of that would be "victim blaming" if the sexes were reversed...

[AnCap Dave]

[yt]A2V61P7XeUM[/yt]

Fromthe comments.

I think you meant to post that in Fail Quotes.

[tnu]

Yes I did sorry abotu that.

[Travis Retriever]

http://www.cracked.com/article_20724_5-laws-that-made-sense-paper-and-disasters-in-reality.html
I suspect this one will be full of epic win.

[Skm1091]

Yes I did sorry abotu that.

And they think that Iran is bad?!

Who next, North Korea?

[Ibrahim90]

And they think that Iran is bad?!

Who next, North Korea?

I'm banking on Zimbabwe, North Korea, the Domocratic republic of Congo, Swaziland, and perhaps a victorious Assad regime.

(yeah, the King of Swaziland is a class act....)

[BlameThe1st]

[Travis Retriever]

Glad SOMEONE remembers that.  Hell, I even remember the jabs made at special needs children just to poke fun at Bush.  Yet the Obamatons have the nerve to bitch about "racism"?

[Skm1091]

Glad SOMEONE remembers that.  Hell, I even remember the jabs made at special needs children just to poke fun at Bush.  Yet the Obamatons have the nerve to bitch about "racism"?

I have had people make excuses for his drone strikes and his NSA spying. Saying that it's because if the republicans or it is better than sending troops. Executive orders anyone?

These people in my eyes, are less than sewage.

[ArtemisVale]

[yt]LRiyttB2Riw[/yt]

Man I can't wait until this game comes out it Dec 13- Oh wait. Dammit i mean march =_=*

[Lord T Hawkeye]

Is that simple enough now?

[Skm1091]

Is that simple enough now?

It's simple we all fail LOL

[Travis Retriever]

It's simple we all fail LOL

Speak for yourself.   I'm not a democrat or a republican.  Statists fail.  The false political dichotomy fails.

[Travis Retriever]

Inspired by D's latest nominee of IE/BBE, I think I'd post a gem from days gone by.   But first, some background--if there is any one economic law that has received more undeserved scorn than Say's Law, I've yet to find it.

"Those who think that the destruction of war [or any destruction] increases total 'demand' [or creates wealth/grows the economy/etc] forget that demand and supply are merely two sides of the same coin.  They are the same thing looked at from different directions.  Supply creates demand because at bottom it is demand.  The supply of the thing they make is all that people have, in fact, to offer in exchange for the things they want.  In this sense the farmers’ supply of wheat constitutes their demand for automobiles and other goods.  All this is inherent in the modern division of labor and in an exchange economy." --Henry Hazlitt, Economics in One Lesson
[]'ed terms added by me for completeness sake.

[MrBogosity]

Inspired by D's latest nominee of IE/BBE, I think I'd post a gem from days gone by.   But first, some background--if there is any one economic law that has received more undeserved scorn than Say's Law, I've yet to find it.

"Those who think that the destruction of war [or any destruction] increases total 'demand' [or creates wealth/grows the economy/etc] forget that demand and supply are merely two sides of the same coin.  They are the same thing looked at from different directions.  Supply creates demand because at bottom it is demand.  The supply of the thing they make is all that people have, in fact, to offer in exchange for the things they want.  In this sense the farmers' supply of wheat constitutes their demand for automobiles and other goods.  All this is inherent in the modern division of labor and in an exchange economy." --Henry Hazlitt, Economics in One Lesson
[]'ed terms added by me for completeness sake.

And very important to Say's Law is the idea that production must precede consumption. How are you going to buy something that hasn't been produced yet? As near as I can tell, to say Say's Law isn't true is to completely deny causality altogether!