Fail Quotes

[BlameThe1st]

Oi vey!

[tnu]

Oi vey!

I want to sya this is parody because the middle statements are pretty much accurate so he should know what he's talking about.

[Travis Retriever]

I want to sya this is parody because the middle statements are pretty much accurate so he should know what he's talking about.

I hope it is a parody.  If not, it means the person admits to repeating long refuted lies.  Just like their creationist cousins.

[Travis Retriever]

[yt]fet5OGFDf8w[/yt]

The comments of this video.  Holy shit, too many creatards-Hal Gailey and ThingWhatKicks especially.  All their comments belong here.

Sadly, so do Tom Woods' comments.  The following from a thread starting from this comment:

"Does anyone know why Mr. Woods has changed the Rush lyrics? The original says, "no his mind is not for rent, to any god or government". By removing the word god from the lyrics. Mr. Woods is thus going out of his way to directly state that his mind is indeed for rent to whatever he calls god. How is his mind to be rented to new information from his god or about his god? Is his mind therefore for rent to the Pope for all practical purposes, or does his god just speak to him directly?"--FutureJim

"Meanwhile, you are getting a free show five times a week. "Thank you" would have sufficed."
Um, not like he's the only one presenting this stuff from on-high.  Get off your high-horse, Tom.

"When Schiff's producer presented me with this intro, I said some hypersensitive listener is going to lecture me about this. He said no one would do so; this would be petty and ridiculous, especially since this is a political show and largely about government. I win.
And yes, I do believe in God, and no, I am neither stupid nor weak for doing so. I actually understand the Thomistic tradition, unlike the hapless Richard Dawkins, who is admired by libertarians for reasons I cannot begin to fathom."
Probably because they're just as into biology and science as WE are.  I will admit Dawkins says some dumb things ('science proves gun control!') but it sure doesn't take away from his ripping theism a new one!

"Look at the 'Likes' section of 65% of young libertarians. He is there. He pontificates on things he knows nothing about. He goes on and on about how Aquinas gives us no reason to think the God of his proofs would have the attributes of traditional Western theism: omniscience, omnipotence, oneness, goodness, etc.

I hope you see the absurdity of that statement.

I genuinely appreciate your kind words and support."
Bald assertions.  Dawkins isn't Matt Dillahunty, but he's still good.

[Travis Retriever]

I'm also going to have to include this guy's username as a fail:
https://www.youtube.com/user/slaves4christ
I thought it was just some random Poe.  Sadly, from the comments and videos it seems legit.  Holy shit.

[nilecroc]

There is no "society" only individuals.

Speaking of epic fails:  "It was kind of like how a fire department would work under the Libertarians." (preceeded by a pic of firefighters from that infamous incident letting a house burn down) via #4 on this list:  http://www.cracked.com/article_16633_the-6-most-horrifying-ways-anyone-ever-got-rich.html
They know that that pic was of GOVERNMENT fire fighters, right?

Actually, society is simply a group off people who happen live in some usually unspecified area. 

[Travis Retriever]

[yt]Lt35BYEOlEw[/yt]
I could list out the fail here, but why ruin the fun of watching it for yourself?
Warning: do NOT listen/watch this with headphones on.  My poor ears. T_T

[ArtemisVale]

[yt]xNCSlDF7HZU[/yt]

[Travis Retriever]

[yt]XMS5aPR9rJo[/yt]
Fail for vegan-tard commentary.

[AnCap Dave]

WARNING: The following fail contains excuse making for Obama's broken promise about keeping your health insurance.

[Travis Retriever]

And to add to D's post: http://reason.com/blog/2013/10/31/obama-says-youre-too-stupid-to-know-what
The fail is from Obama/White House/etc, not from Reason.  Yes, Obama actually said shit like that.

[Travis Retriever]

[yt]N4QFsKevTXs[/yt]
And the comments the OP leaves like this one:  "No they would be an agnostic. There are not two categories which everything falls into. They would not make a claim at all. Atheism is the belief that God doesn't exist. Agnosticism is the absence of belief."

[tnu]

[Travis Retriever]

Good grief...

[dallen68]

[yt]N4QFsKevTXs[/yt]
And the comments the OP leaves like this one:  "No they would be an agnostic. There are not two categories which everything falls into. They would not make a claim at all. Atheism is the belief that God doesn't exist. Agnosticism is the absence of belief."

My head is spinning. I don't even know what to call the logical fallacies in there. I'm guessing some quote mining, and some form of non sequitor.  Also, I'd have to know where he gets "mild paranoid delusion is actually more beneficial for survival than an accurate assessment of the environment" from. From my experience, in an emergency situation, you want the guy that can keep a level head and make an accurate assessment of said situation; not the one that's in a panic and blowing things out of proportion. Oh, yeah, and it helps a great deal if level-headed-calm guy has some sort of training dealing with situations similar to the one you're in.