Fail Quotes

[Ibrahim90]

[yt]fUHk9FLZMf4[/yt]

I'm surprised we got this far into a fail quotes thread and DIDN'T post stuff from this idiot.

In my opinion, tsoukales doesn't belong here. He's so batshit he deserves his own thread...

[AnCap Dave]

[AnCap Dave]

[yt]T4HUvXOvgkQ[/yt]

Seriously, the corruption is just ridiculously blatant at this point.

[MrBogosity]

So for those of you who thought oneformtothenext's comments on Atheism and Libertarianism 2 were bad, see him on: [yt]6IAExlOz2OM[/yt]

I was trying to explain to him how we know the universe is old (yes, he's a YEC!), and recommended Lawrence Krauss's book to him. He replied:

"Krauss says that he looks @ galaxies from a billion years ago?? What does he mean by that, is he serious??"

I tried to educate him: "You don't see the moon the way it is now, but as it was ~1.5 seconds ago. You see the sun as it was ~8 minutes ago. The further away, the longer light takes to get here, so we see Betelgeuse as it was ~800 years ago, the Andromeda Galaxy ~2 million years ago, etc. The further out you look, the further back in time you look."

And he replied: "hahaha who taught u that piece of witchcraft???"

And immediately after: "The light doesn't actually have to reach your eye for u to see the moon! If I sit in complete darkness I can still see a bright object even though there is no light shining on me!"

His comments about children doing drugs after they're legalized look quite sane compared to this!

[Travis Retriever]

So for those of you who thought oneformtothenext's comments on Atheism and Libertarianism 2 were bad, see him on: [yt]6IAExlOz2OM[/yt]

I was trying to explain to him how we know the universe is old (yes, he's a YEC!), and recommended Lawrence Krauss's book to him. He replied:

"Krauss says that he looks @ galaxies from a billion years ago?? What does he mean by that, is he serious??"

I tried to educate him: "You don't see the moon the way it is now, but as it was ~1.5 seconds ago. You see the sun as it was ~8 minutes ago. The further away, the longer light takes to get here, so we see Betelgeuse as it was ~800 years ago, the Andromeda Galaxy ~2 million years ago, etc. The further out you look, the further back in time you look."

And he replied: "hahaha who taught u that piece of witchcraft???"

And immediately after: "The light doesn't actually have to reach your eye for u to see the moon! If I sit in complete darkness I can still see a bright object even though there is no light shining on me!"

His comments about children doing drugs after they're legalized look quite sane compared to this!

Christ, that's stupid even for a YEC!

[MrBogosity]

Christ, that's stupid even for a YEC!

And now: "It is only the excess glare from the sun or moon that actually makes contact with your eyes! When u see the sphere of the moon, the light that u see is actually on the moon and u are seeing the moon in real time!"

Someone PLEASE tell me he's a Poe...

[AnCap Dave]

Double standards much?

[BlameThe1st]

Have We All Been Fooled By Edward Snowden?

And here I thought only right-wing uber-patriots hated Snowden, but it turns out the far left hates him too. Why? Because in their eyes, he's the worst type of person in the world: an internet libertarian!

The article talks about how Snowden was an ardent Ron Paul supporter and "gun nut" who sought a return to the Gold Standard, hated Obama and his policies, and even joked about Social Security.

But, by far, the most facepalm-inducing paragraph of this article comes right at the end, where the author speculates that Snowden's leaks were a giant conspiracy:

This new information has me pondering exactly who this guy is: is he the concerned whistle-blower? Or did he have an ulterior motive to spill what he did? His background isn't really CIA or NSA material, so say a few people I've spoken to who actually have worked for a government contractor. So why was he hired? And why did he pick now to speak out? This has never smelled right to me, which is why I have withheld judgement. But these new revelations create even more questions. Is this whole thing a ruse to make the President look bad? If so, who is funding it – who is paying for all his travel and hotels? Or is Edward Snowden, a man who has completely destroyed his own life, just stupid? I still don't know but this new information gives me a lot to think about. How about you?

Sweet Celestia, why doesn't he just go ahead and accuse Snowden of being a Koch Brother puppet? We all know this bogon emitter thinks that. These libtards all assume that anyone right of Joseph Stalin is secretly in cahoots with the Kochs.

[tnu]

What's all the fuss about the Koch brothers anyway? I don't get it.

[BlameThe1st]

Don't you know? They're trying to take over America and turn it into a neo-feudalist plutocracy!

[tnu]

Don't you know? They're trying to take over America and turn it into a neo-feudalist plutocracy!

I've never heard such a thing. I just keep hearing "But the Koch Brothers were involved int his" which is bad for osmeundefined reason.

[Gumba Masta]

Don't you know? They're trying to take over America and turn it into a neo-feudalist plutocracy!

You say as if this wasa  bad thing, peasent.

[MrBogosity]

What's all the fuss about the Koch brothers anyway? I don't get it.

It's the liberals' version of the Rothschilds.

[Gumba Masta]

It's the liberals' version of the Rothschilds.

Don't they want to do the same thing?

[MrBogosity]

Don't they want to do the same thing?

Yes, and that's why we know it's batshit crazy.

Cos we all know it's REALLY Pinky and The Brain doing it all!