Fail Quotes

[Travis Retriever]

*Sigh*
Why is it that Occupy Democrats keeps getting on here?

Because they're that delusional...and yeah...@OP:  The race card! What's in *your* wallet?

Because it's not an atrocity when 'your team' does it...

[Isolder74]

And +Lucas Howes flat out lying about my posts.  /sigh
So he bitches about me and others arguing about an ice cream video...while he participates.  And he trolled me.  Blah. This is what happens when you post late at night without sleep. But yeah, for the bigoted comments "HUR DUR YOU AUTIST!" etc he gets blocked and reported.  Bigoted douche.

When these people are consistent and actually start calling out the organic food, the cage free/'cruelty free', non-GMO and other scams and examples of what I call Gourmet Bling (much love to Cracked.com for that phrase), I them more seriously. Until then, I'll take them about as seriously as a morbidly obese man selling a diet book.  Of course it's always the generic, cheapo brands/foods they go after (as Dallen mentioned ).  Never the fancy hoity toity crap like Spanish Souffle (1/4+ a stick of butter in every serving).
Folks, if you're gonna play the "WAH THAT'S DISGUSTING AND BAD AND SHOULDN'T BE EATEN!" moral outrage card, go all the way, or go home.  This selective (fake) indignation crap is complete bogosity.

A lot of the time the only way that Organic food is in any way an improvement in quality based on the price is if you can buy it VERY locally, meaning that the transport time is short enough that produce picked ripe can actually make it to the market in a sellable state.  Most produce organic or otherwise is usually picked green in order to ensure as long of a transport chain as possible.  In fact the longer it has to travel the lower in taste it will have.  There are fruits that have to picked without being ripe first(such as pears and avocados) but those are limited.  Even some that can be fine green, like apples, are better picked ripe off the tree. 

When it comes to "cage free" or any other marketing buzz because the regulations are only strict when it comes to organic those can mean nothing more then a building where the animals are kept just standing around.  Free range can just mean they open the door once a day.  Pasture raised they at least have to let them out of the building once a day. 

Natural food isn't necessarily any better then other food.  It is true that the more something is processed the less it contains of the original nutrition.  However this does not mean that the food is devoid of anything other then starch.  The only thing that makes brown rice different then white rice is the bran coat is still on the grain so it takes longer for the grain to cook and soften.  It still has just the same amount of starch in it. 

I wouldn't recommend trying to live on just rammen noodles(or any other single food type) either.

[R.E.H.W.R.]

Because they're that delusional...and yeah...@OP:  The race card! What's in *your* wallet?
Because it's not an atrocity when 'your team' does it...

So someone finally caught up with the stupidity of Being Liberal.

[Ibrahim90]

well, since the actual person didn't do this, I would conclude the person(s) who made this poster is an idiot or liar...or both.

[dallen68]

well, since the actual person didn't do this, I would conclude the person(s) who made this poster is an idiot or liar...or both.

Plus, if a white president did those things, I'd think the exact same thing as if a purple president with yellow polka dots did those things. Unfortunately, the black (well half-black) president that we're supposed to be thinking about didn't actually do those things.

[MrBogosity]

Plus, if a white president did those things, I'd think the exact same thing as if a purple president with yellow polka dots did those things. Unfortunately, the black (well half-black) president that we're supposed to be thinking about didn't actually do those things.

It's interesting, isn't it, that Obama is half black but counts as black, but Zimmerman is half Latino but counts as white...

[AnCap Dave]

It's interesting, isn't it, that Obama is half black but counts as black, but Zimmerman is half Latino but counts as white...

That's because in Loony Liberal Land, it's different when the guy does something they like.

[Lord T Hawkeye]

http://lordthawkeye.deviantart.com/journal/A-case-of-a-guilty-conscience-405158014

aaaaceace in the comments spins the old yarn that all the spending is due to military and he took politics in college (like that's supposed to mean anything to me).

*yawn*
*One google search later*

Sorry lefties, medicare and medicaid alone blow defense spending out of the water.  There is NOT a shortage of entitlement programs.  Bloody give it up already!

[BlameThe1st]

Stumbled across this fail on Tumblr (of course!):

How come you don't find Libertarians in impoverished countries? Why hasn't a farmer in the Third World ever said to themselves: "Fuck, we need more Capitalism"?

It wouldn't be because it's a privileged philosophy, now would it? Because people who see the blunt end of Capitalism don't often call for more of it.

[Lord T Hawkeye]

How come you don't find Libertarians in impoverished countries? Why hasn't a farmer in the Third World ever said to themselves: "Fuck, we need more Capitalism"?

It wouldn't be because it's a privileged philosophy, now would it? Because people who see the blunt end of Capitalism don't often call for more of it.

Oh please!  If there were libertarians in those countries, you window breakers would shift gears and say "See!  SEE?!   There's libertarians there and they're poor!  It's all their fault!!"

Bloody sophists.  When they win, they win.  When they lose, they win.  When they tie, they win.

[Travis Retriever]

Oh please!  If there were libertarians in those countries, you window breakers would shift gears and say "See!  SEE?!   There's libertarians there and they're poor!  It's all their fault!!"

Bloody sophists.  When they win, they win.  When they lose, they win.  When they tie, they win.

Mhm.  The mark of the bullshitter--always have an out no matter what evidence is presented against you.

[R.E.H.W.R.]

So, my mother is watching The Doctors are they are seriously pulling the "Why aren't chemicals banned abroad banned in the US?" Malarkey.

[AnCap Dave]

I'm including the creator of the image as part of the fail here for being a fucking pussy and covering the names of these douchebags up.

Fuck that shit. You say something retarded on something as public as the internet, you deserve all the shame you get.

I hope these fuckers step on some legos.

[AnCap Dave]

Oh hey, state fag boy returns.

What's your take on this? I've taken note that in the U.S., they have gone towards legislation of marijuana. In my country, they go the other way. They've just decided to ban smoking cigarettes in public facilities and at public transport stations. Before it was inside pubs, and before that again on airplanes. Marijuana was never allowed.

My two cents, is that I completely support the ban of all types of smoking. I really do. Why? Because it invades my privacy. If I am forced to inhale the smoke of others, I react similarly to someone stepping right up into my face. It's uncomfortable, and I have to move away. In some spots, that's troublesome, like when waiting for a bus in pissing rain, and someone lights up a blunt right next to you. Other times, I just get annoyed by the lack of respect from someone lighting a cigarette, full well knowing that someone else will feel bad from the smell and the expansion of the smoke, threatening to enter your lungs too.

So what is different between smoking and drinking? Shouldn't they both be banned because they are toxic substances? Personally, I don't think so. If there was a way to inhale all the smoke, without breathing it out, and without the tip of the cigar burning, I would have no issue with it. Go ahead, kill your lung function. It's your own choice, I probably can't stop you. However, smoking is invasive on others. I don't have a choice but to accept the passive smoking, whereas you have a choice not to drink.

About marijuana, it's not poisenous. Sure, it smells like shit, but I am in no direct danger from it. The main issue with marijuana, compared to alcohol, is that people smoke it every day and reduce their brain function. Just as I get annoyed by drunks when sober, I get annoyed by people who are high. Also, in certain areas (*cough* Amsterdam, I'm looking at you *cough*), the stench of marijuana is so dense, that once again, the invasive argument counts. I'll be able to get high, just by my mere presence. That's way worse than drinking imo. For the tool bags who actually need to light up dat kush to chill out, you cease to be able to operate some time alright. That makes you no better than an alcoholic if you crave weed every day.

I don't think I've ever hated a person more in my life. Is there anything this guy doesn't want a government to do?

[Ibrahim90]

Oh hey, state fag boy returns.

I don't think I've ever hated a person more in my life. Is there anything this guy doesn't want a government to do?

let us deconstruct this guy:

What's your take on this? I've taken note that in the U.S., they have gone towards legislation of marijuana. In my country, they go the other way. They've just decided to ban smoking cigarettes in public facilities and at public transport stations. Before it was inside pubs, and before that again on airplanes. Marijuana was never allowed.

my take is that it is good news: the lift on the ban in Colorado generated near half-a Billion Dollars in the first year for the State government alone. This clearly demonstrates that the business is in the multi-Billion dollar range, and so represents for the near 20 million Coloradans opportunities for new jobs, new products, etc. And in fact last I heard, the local economy has improved quite a bit--do you not want people to at least work? Also the Sufis might start flooding the place: if ever a society needed someone, it is a sufi. We need more whirling, less hate.

(that and back home there is traditionally a huge Marijuana culture. We have all sorts of "mastool/mi7ashshish" jokes)

and fuck you country.

My two cents, is that I completely support the ban of all types of smoking.

thank you for proving you are an asshole.

I really do. Why? Because it invades my privacy. If I am forced to inhale the smoke of others, I react similarly to someone stepping right up into my face. It's uncomfortable, and I have to move away. In some spots, that's troublesome, like when waiting for a bus in pissing rain, and someone lights up a blunt right next to you. Other times, I just get annoyed by the lack of respect from someone lighting a cigarette, full well knowing that someone else will feel bad from the smell and the expansion of the smoke, threatening to enter your lungs too.

here are some suggestions:

1-don't go to a place where you know there are lots of smokers
2-if a smoker walks into a place, you can just move away
3-grow a pair of testicles: if a man steps up to your face, you put your foot down
4-mind your fucking business.
5-if you totally need to be somewhere: just tell the guy to please smoke elsewhere.

no need to waste your people's tax dollars on this. the above is totally free, and works 99.9% of the time. failure at worst might lead to a broken nose.

So what is different between smoking and drinking? Shouldn't they both be banned because they are toxic substances? Personally, I don't think so.

one is liquid the other isn't?

If there was a way to inhale all the smoke, without breathing it out, and without the tip of the cigar burning, I would have no issue with it. Go ahead, kill your lung function. It's your own choice, I probably can't stop you. However, smoking is invasive on others. I don't have a choice but to accept the passive smoking, whereas you have a choice not to drink.

e-cigarrettes? the Hookah (it's just water vapor when done properly)? chewing tobacco--no smoke then?

and yes, you do have a choice: move away from the person. don't be in the same room. If you have to be in the room, politely tell him to smoke elsewhere. Why is this so hard to do? I do it all the time. I don't need some assholes in Austin, Denver, or DC, doing it for me.

also, "invasive"? dude, dude. whenever I breathe, I am going to be invading someone's space with my microbes. Whenever I walk into a place after work, I will be invading the air with dust. This is called "being alive". you should try it sometime.

and let us leave that for a minute: Alcohol's effects aren't invasive? So people don't drive drunk and kill people by the battalia every year? I don't know about you, but this is as invasive as it gets--murdering people because you couldn't be bothered with responsibility.

About marijuana, it's not poisenous. Sure, it smells like shit, but I am in no direct danger from it. The main issue with marijuana, compared to alcohol, is that people smoke it every day and reduce their brain function. Just as I get annoyed by drunks when sober, I get annoyed by people who are high. Also, in certain areas (*cough* Amsterdam, I'm looking at you *cough*), the stench of marijuana is so dense, that once again, the invasive argument counts. I'll be able to get high, just by my mere presence. That's way worse than drinking imo. For the tool bags who actually need to light up dat kush to chill out, you cease to be able to operate some time alright. That makes you no better than an alcoholic if you crave weed every day.

I do too don't like Marijuana. But shit, That's their problem, not yours. And no one said you had to be in Amsterdam....And doubtless you are exaggerating. I never got high from all the weed smoked in the rooms around me. Most students at CSU didn't. And reduces brain function? so does alcohol if you drink everyday. In fact, that would be way worse: Marijuana doesn't rot your liver.

and fuck, "crave" weed? didn't you learn anything about Marijuana that a two year old could grasp? Marijuana isn't addictive. there is no real "craving" of the drug. it's just that it feels good--like sex or making an A in class. it only differs from the two in that it is a generally ill-advised idea.

also, "tool bags"? I know people who regularly smoke weed. They are people who have more character, better brains, and less retard that you do.

and yeah, I'll say it: you are a pussy. Women have more balls than you do--let that sink in and remember it. Why? because you whine about other people doing what they want absent violence or fraud, and yet demand that some group of assholes who don't know you (i.e. Government), go and use the two against people over this. So you:

-can't stand people being people
-don't even have the balls to fight it yourself. you let government fight your battles for you.