Fail Quotes

[nilecroc]

http://www.cracked.com/article_19785_5-ways-modern-men-are-trained-to-hate-women.html
The fail article I promised in fav quotes.

So did he skip high school biology?

[nilecroc]

So my psychology just blamed just blamed people hating America's foriegn intervetionist policy on gun rights supporters. He then said that you can't let people carry guns on campus because you can't tell whose psychotic.

[MrBogosity]

So my psychology just blamed just blamed people hating America's foriegn intervetionist policy on gun rights supporters. He then said that you can't let people carry guns on campus because you can't tell whose psychotic.

Then we should force all men to wear chastity belts because you can't tell who's a rapist.

[Altimadark]

Fail comments on YouTube? Must be a day ending in "Y."

[yt]cqUE8u4RNWs[/yt]

Here's some from one MrDoubtfulguest, who has, umm, "issues," with anarchism. Myself in blue, he in red.

I learn about anarchy from actual anarchists -- anarchists who respect private property, who hold themselves to moral principles, and who reject the initiation of violence and other forms of coercion.

...try those book things, because I think your pals are libertarians (absent intellectual rigor) calling themselves anarchists without knowing the first thing about anarchism. They probably just think it sounds cool.

Your ad hominem aside, I think the people you're calling anarchists are the ones who don't know the first thing about it.

Furthermore, I'm not going to go hunting for your evidence for you, regardless of the media it's on. If you have evidence, you provide it yourself.

I think it is SO cute when little internet tots use Latin. I've noticed "ad hominem" is a big one with the internet generation, some sort of meme with the little poseurs. Oh, you wouldn't know "evidence" if it came up and pissed on your shoes because you don't READ.

[Travis Retriever]

Fail comments on YouTube? Must be a day ending in "Y."

[yt]cqUE8u4RNWs[/yt]

Here's some from one MrDoubtfulguest, who has, umm, "issues," with anarchism. Myself in blue, he in red.

I learn about anarchy from actual anarchists -- anarchists who respect private property, who hold themselves to moral principles, and who reject the initiation of violence and other forms of coercion.

...try those book things, because I think your pals are libertarians (absent intellectual rigor) calling themselves anarchists without knowing the first thing about anarchism. They probably just think it sounds cool.

Your ad hominem aside, I think the people you're calling anarchists are the ones who don't know the first thing about it.

Furthermore, I'm not going to go hunting for your evidence for you, regardless of the media it's on. If you have evidence, you provide it yourself.

I think it is SO cute when little internet tots use Latin. I've noticed "ad hominem" is a big one with the internet generation, some sort of meme with the little poseurs. Oh, you wouldn't know "evidence" if it came up and pissed on your shoes because you don't READ.

Give him this:  http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ad+hominem

[Travis Retriever]

[AnCap Dave]

[yt]91w_qMB5rYY[/yt]

I want to punch Alex Jones in the face. I really really do.

[nilecroc]

[yt]HzNjouheyZk[/yt]

[AnCap Dave]

[tnu]

When did we have a recovery? But more on the topic, I can't vouch for this video i'm about to post since I haven't watched it yet but naturally you can find plenty of fail in the comments.

[yt]nTeWwPMiqvs[/yt]

Some samples.

Okak, Now your really beginning to sound like an idiot. People like you simply don't understand how the world works. You think everything in politics is just so simple. And that all your opinions can be done with just a few words. You have to look at the whole picture, instead of just your deluded one. The only country I can think of that has as much freedom as us is some third world counties. But it doesn't work as enlightening as you might think in those other countries.

2. You really do sound selfish when you make silly comments like this. This isn't a movie, I know you wish it was, but it isn't. I'm sure this weird ass thinking of yours came from reading to much fictional books, and probably some pot head on welfare checks and food stamps told you it, and now you just want to be different. People like to make the claim that we have been lied to are whole lives. Cause you no, we live in North Korea. In America we can literately look up anything we want on Bing.

3. Unlike Russia, we can browse the internet however we like, and countries that actually have it bad. We can leave are country and go anywhere we want. In any part of the world. Don't you think of are corrupt evil Government was trying to "brainwash us" they would let us visit other parts of the world. Keep us confined in are own country all the time. Like North Korea for instance.

4. If our country really was brain washing us, they wouldn't give a rats ass about the constitution and are freedom. But they do. They wouldn't ask us about gun control, they would just take are guns. They could easily not allow flights leaving the Country. Now I'm sure this wont convince you, you bat shit conspiracy kids don't take your wrong for an answer. Even when presented with facts. Your too stuck in your fantasy world. Which is exactly where your real enemies want you to be.

I'm reminded of a quote. "Not as shit as it could be is not the same as good" for one.

[Travis Retriever]

Every single comment left on Shane's videos by Underlings.

A sample from Part 1 of his atheism/libertarianism series:
[yt]anP42zvPPRQ[/yt]

"Since slaveless societies EXISTED throughout the world (including nations comparable to the US), THAT was evidence that abolition of slavery could work. But you're making a claim WITHOUT supportive evidence, only ASSERTING that large statelessness can work.

You go out of your way to insult me for challenging your claims...yet I'M the evil fuck? You evidently have some serious anger issues to work out. Are you capable of mature debate or is this the best I can expect from you?"

Speaks for itself.  So how many logical fallacies in that can you name?

[ArtemisVale]

http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/bschwar1/Sci.Amer.pdf

[Travis Retriever]

http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/bschwar1/Sci.Amer.pdf

Ugh.  Reminds me of a win article from the Mises Institute more or less obliterating that 'happiness research' horseshit.
https://mises.org/daily/5356
A sample: "The concept of demonstrated preference is simply this: that actual choice reveals, or demonstrates, a man's preferences; that is, that his preferences are deducible from what he has chosen in action. Thus, if a man chooses to spend an hour at a concert rather than a movie, we deduce that the former was preferred, or ranked higher on his value scale. ... This concept of preference, rooted in real choices, forms the keystone of the logical structure of economic analysis, and particularly of utility and welfare analysis."--courtesy of Murray Rothbard.
I posted the above in fav quotes too.  It was a very good read.

[nilecroc]

Every single comment left on Shane's videos by Underlings.

A sample from Part 1 of his atheism/libertarianism series:
[yt]anP42zvPPRQ[/yt]

"Since slaveless societies EXISTED throughout the world (including nations comparable to the US), THAT was evidence that abolition of slavery could work. But you're making a claim WITHOUT supportive evidence, only ASSERTING that large statelessness can work.

You go out of your way to insult me for challenging your claims...yet I'M the evil fuck? You evidently have some serious anger issues to work out. Are you capable of mature debate or is this the best I can expect from you?"

Speaks for itself.  So how many logical fallacies in that can you name?

How would you respond to the  pigovian tax argument of the other dumbass?

[Travis Retriever]

How would you respond to the  pigovian tax argument of the other dumbass?

Dunno who you're talking about.