Out of boredom, I remembered FSAthe1st saying something about usconstitution.net and using that as a source for his videos. Figured I'd look it up and see just what transpired at that point. One google search of "site:usconstitution.net FCPA" later and...
http://usconstitution.net/newforum/archive/index.php/t-139.html?s=ad8d201f2c0e1b411406722e5d1db28c
http://usconstitution.net/newforum/showthread.php?139-Foreign-Corrupt-Practices-Act-1977...-Is-it-Constitutional/page3
It would seem that he was less than honest with the debate. Anyone think it a little odd that though he offered to link to the original conversations, he never did? Nor did he actually portray the debate accurately?
EDIT: I also found the source he used for his answer to the 'Law of Nations' question. Apparently, he didn't know the answer, nor did he actually use his own wording. He copied it literally word for word from the wikipedia article for "Jus Gentium".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_gentium
I think he really might be up for "Idiot extraordinaire" Shane. Whaddya say?
Quote from: Lord T Hawkeye on August 17, 2011, 10:38:18 PM
I think he really might be up for "Idiot extraordinaire" Shane. Whaddya say?
I second that. TheAtheistPaladin also released a video documenting how he apparently got banned for pointing out that FSAthe1st wasn't supporting his argument for how one should interpret the constitution.
Quote from: Lord T Hawkeye on August 17, 2011, 10:38:18 PM
I think he really might be up for "Idiot extraordinaire" Shane. Whaddya say?
I was thinking the same thing.