Fail Quotes

[Travis Retriever]

[yt]34Xla8XPYz0[/yt]

#1 roads
#2 courts
#3 borders

What question is that (the numbered items) supposed to be an answer to?

[MrBogosity]

Same video: http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=0iZYEgff-k0

GreyKnight7777 is so desperate he's accusing me of deleting my comments out of cowardice:



Funny, since right after he posted this I took this ACTUAL screenshot of the exchange:



EDIT: And now he's claiming that these are two different conversations!

[Travis Retriever]

Same video: http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=0iZYEgff-k0

GreyKnight7777 is so desperate he's accusing me of deleting my comments out of cowardice:



Funny, since right after he posted this I took this ACTUAL screenshot of the exchange:



EDIT: And now he's claiming that these are two different conversations!

What an asshole.  I don't even think I've seen other statists go that far.

[Skm1091]

What an asshole.  I don't even think I've seen other statists go that far.

And Statists still wonder why we consider them exactly like creationists?

[MrBogosity]

What an asshole.  I don't even think I've seen other statists go that far.

He's now saying that the deleted post was of me saying:

Here's the definition of "corporation" from dictionaryDOTlawDOTcom: "an organization formed with state governmental approval to act as an artificial person to carry on business (or other activities), which can sue or be sued, and (unless it is non-profit) can issue shares of stock to raise funds with which to start a business or increase its capital."

Note: WITH STATE GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL.

Funny how that post is still there. (There is a deleted post above it, which may have been me deleting and reposting to fix a typo or something, but either way, using it to attack my character is EXTREMELY bogus.)

[MrBogosity]

And Statists still wonder why we consider them exactly like creationists?

FSAthe1st even attacked peer review in those comments!

[Travis Retriever]

@Skm1091: Mhm.  If the glove fits as they say.

@Shane: I facepalmed when they talked about "well calling someone a statist is like calling someone an evolutionist; both are facts.  Statism is the unavoidable result of huge societies."
1.  If that's true, then how can he give examples of failures of it when, by his own admission, it hasn't happened/been tried?  2.  rewind 200 years ago, he'd have said the same of slavery.

[Travis Retriever]

/sigh
And we have fucktards like FSAthe1st and others claiming that because govco hasn't shut down BitCoin, govco isn't force.  I wish I was making that up.

[Ibrahim90]

@Skm1091: Mhm.  If the glove fits as they say.

@Shane: I facepalmed when they talked about "well calling someone a statist is like calling someone an evolutionist; both are facts.  Statism is the unavoidable result of huge societies."
1.  If that's true, then how can he give examples of failures of it when, by his own admission, it hasn't happened/been tried?  2.  rewind 200 years ago, he'd have said the same of slavery.

Or that Non-Anglicans having rights in the UK was subversive and dangerous....

@ Surhot: you know, except for all the times Government has shut down places, like Megaupload for example.

[R.E.H.W.R.]

FSAthe1st even attacked peer review in those comments!

I'm not going to sugercoat it! He's insane!

[Skm1091]

I'm not going to sugercoat it! He's insane!

Insane is not strong enough of a word. Batshit deranged, demented, egomaniac is a better definition. This fucker is also a censoring coward isn't he?

[tnu]

My god this man is a fuckign sociopath




Tnu

Really then? WHat do I do when the government decides they don't like what I'm saying? Like I siad i'm willing to be reasonable, i'll give up my gun rights when the state gives up all of their guns. Why is that so unreaasonable? Why do they deserve to have guns? Why are they any mroe trustworhty then the ocmmon man?
· in reply to Daniel Martinez
Daniel Martinez



Daniel Martinez

Answer: the goverment has power, you have the power that the goverment gives you.

Can you fight against an entire division of the army? No

Can you fight against 8 tanks trying to kill you and your family? No

Can you fight against a bomber squad in the sky? No

You have the guns because the goverment gives you permision to have them, because it gives you the "ilusion" of power, in truth you have only the power the goverments wants you to have.



In refrence its part of the gun contorlivdeo already linked.

[Travis Retriever]

Or that Non-Anglicans having rights in the UK was subversive and dangerous....

@ Surhot: you know, except for all the times Government has shut down places, like Megaupload for example.

I know, right?  His argument is like saying that "well because I can point to people Hitler DIDN'T kill that means he isn't a mass murderer!" I mean, come on!

[Travis Retriever]

"I've already asked this question, but you seem to have missed it. Outside of a set of societal rules (codified or otherwise), what would a "marriage" be? "--GreyKnight7777, proving he is a state cultist.

[Skm1091]

My god this man is a fuckign sociopath




Tnu

Really then? WHat do I do when the government decides they don't like what I'm saying? Like I siad i'm willing to be reasonable, i'll give up my gun rights when the state gives up all of their guns. Why is that so unreaasonable? Why do they deserve to have guns? Why are they any mroe trustworhty then the ocmmon man?
?in reply to Daniel Martinez
Daniel Martinez



Daniel Martinez

Answer: the goverment has power, you have the power that the goverment gives you.

Can you fight against an entire division of the army? No

Can you fight against 8 tanks trying to kill you and your family? No

Can you fight against a bomber squad in the sky? No

You have the guns because the goverment gives you permision to have them, because it gives you the "ilusion" of power, in truth you have only the power the goverments wants you to have.



In refrence its part of the gun contorlivdeo already linked.

What Martinez is saying in nutshell 1. Bend over even though you know it's wrong. 2. My killer is good, Your killer is bad.

So if one day the government said, that free speech is illegal he would go along with eh?

Sick bastard indeed.

BTW do know the exact video?