Fail Quotes

[AnCap Dave]

From the same thread as the previous fail quote:

Being gay has nothing to do with the ban it's the personalities of being gay . Unless you see it then you can't judge . There are many type of gays out there nothin wrong with them but remember there are those who Behave in the manner of a female and in the military women and men are separated. That's one reason

Also like it or hate we have a right to our own opinions and most soilders that don't like gays wobt serve under or with them so this causes problems with chain command and so fort.


My take on it as I only met some when I was going under initial training in the navy , they should be able to serve but must conduct themselves in a manner to make their fellow soldiers comfortable and professionally like the rest of us. If they don't like being mock then they should keep their sexuallity to themselves we all already do.

[MrBogosity]

Sheesh, Obamatons...



1. Actually, that was a result of intelligence initiatives began during the Bush administration.

2. And replaced him with...?

3. A very mild hurricane which Wal-Mart and Home Depot had to pick up the slack from FEMA's bumbling.

4. Yeah, what's the unemployment rate again?

5. Dunkin? He didn't bring Krispy Kreme? He couldn't even get THAT right!

[Travis Retriever]

Sheesh, Obamatons...



1. Actually, that was a result of intelligence initiatives began during the Bush administration.

2. And replaced him with...?

3. A very mild hurricane which Wal-Mart and Home Depot had to pick up the slack from FEMA's bumbling.

4. Yeah, what's the unemployment rate again?

5. Dunkin? He didn't bring Krispy Kreme? He couldn't even get THAT right!

1-4:  True dat.
5. Sweet! Another person who thinks Krispy Kreme's Donuts > Dunkin Donuts! ^_^

[Virgil0211]

1-4:  True dat.
5. Sweet! Another person who thinks Krispy Kreme's Donuts > Dunkin Donuts! ^_^

Personally, I think donuts = donuts. Leads to a great deal of redundant coding in my scripts. :-P

[Travis Retriever]

Personally, I think donuts = donuts. Leads to a great deal of redundant coding in my scripts. :-P

And that is why you have trouble programming, my Texan friend.

[Virgil0211]

And that is why you have trouble programming, my Texan friend.

I'm going to pull a statist trick and emphasize one word out of your entire statement.

What!? Being a Texan has nothing to do with my programming skills, you deluded fool!

[Ibrahim90]

Sheesh, Obamatons...

1. Actually, that was a result of intelligence initiatives began during the Bush administration.

2. And replaced him with...?

3. A very mild hurricane which Wal-Mart and Home Depot had to pick up the slack from FEMA's bumbling.

4. Yeah, what's the unemployment rate again?

5. Dunkin? He didn't bring Krispy Kreme? He couldn't even get THAT right!

1-4: agreed.

he didn't bring Krispy kreme because he's a cheap bastard. I'm too dirt poor myself to get krispy kreme-at least get it for me (and everyone else) 

[Ibrahim90]

oh boy, here's a doozy. found it today, when I finally noticed Shane's vid on 9/11 (the follow up):

it's from a guy named ahbilash sth or other.

@shanedk Arabs do not live in free nations, nations where people are free to express their opinions and reporters are free to report on them. You are quoting Reem Al-Faisal but you wouldn't quote me if I said what I think the opinions of Arabs are. Reem Al Faisal doesn't live or report from a free country. You cannot presume that she or the people she is reporting on are freely expressing themselves. Reem Al Faisal is from Saudi Arabia. Remember that.

where do I even begin?

[spoiler]first off, in order to understand the rest of what I have to say, I need to point out something, in case anyone doesn't know: I am an Arab-a Palestinian one. it matters here, since it colors my understanding of the situation (so yeah, I admit my biases in advance):


yeah, most Arab countries are far from free. yeah, freedom of speech is limited in most Arab countries. but that's just about where his OK line (it's not even accurate) is correct, and the rest is flat out Bullshit:

1- Even if she were (IIRC she ain't) in Al-Arabiyyah (a Saudi based agency), and is Saudi, by his logic she would have been in Jail by now, since Saudi Arabia's government supports the United States. so not only is what he said a non-sequitur, it also proves that he must be retarded mentally-even babies, the micro-cephalic, and the Autistic could figure that out.

2-yes, most Arabs absolutely hate the United States; and they hate it for exactly the reason Ron Paul and others (including Shane and Virgil) say they hate it: they are fed up with the US meddling in their affairs, killing them, putting bases in among them, propping up dictators, etc. why this clown never bothered to actually ask an Arab in Person, in a part of the world more to his liking (like some shit hole country in Europe), is beyond me.

now, I add this part, since I'm sure that's what he really thinks is the motivation of Terrorists:

while religion-specifically Islam-plays a role, it works differently from how some out there think it does. Islam doesn't really ask people to kill others just for being different (yeah, I know, hard to believe). applying this fact to the present, it becomes clear that no one is attacking America for being Christian demographically, or for it's liberties. it does say that it is the duty of every Muslim to fight aggressors, oppressors, and the unjust-it's a direct Qur'anic injunction, what is termed a "Fard 'Ayin" and to strive to improve the world, physically and spiritually-especially for Muslims. this is the essence of Jihad: the idea that action (or effort-the literal meaning of the term) could help improve the world. and yes, it does in part involve military effort-though for the above mentioned reasons (ideally).

And of course going from there, it is very easy to see why people in the Muslim world are receptive to Bin Laden's message: not out of the desire to terrorize non-Muslims for having liberty (or even being non-Muslim), but to fight back against what many perceive to be the injustice, tyranny, oppression, and hypocrisy of the US (a perception born out to them by America's foreign policy). In short, it is used to add to the legitimacy of the terrorists' grievances, and give emotional and spiritual weight to their actions (and those of non terrorist Arab Muslims as well). it's even used to justify what Islam itself forbids, like direct killing of the unarmed (civilians in particular, but also the POW beheadings): the argument is that the US people supported Bush and his policies by voting him in, thereby they are part of the govt. and from there, supporters and members of the Armed forces of the US-a non-sequituur yes, but that's how I've seen it justified-for example by a leader of Yemen's al-qaeda branch. (I can't find the video sadly enough; he wore glasses, white dishdashe and kufiyye, thick kinky-curly dark beard, trimmed moustache, dark skin (not black though) -interview was in Arabic  )

does that of course excuse the terrorists? no. Does it mean Islam is perfect, and that there aren't Muslims who attack (or have) non-Muslims for being so? no-the opposite is clearly the case. but you start to see its genuine role in the whole debacle, at least with the average Arab, or even Average terrorists.[/spoiler]


sorry for the long rant. I had to get it out of my system. I just hate it when an opens his mouth on what he doesn't know. I would have replied to him, but with YT's silly 500 character limit, it's hard to do so and be accurate.

[Travis Retriever]

Sorry for the long rant. I had to get it out of my system. I just hate it when an opens his mouth on what he doesn't know. I would have replied to him, but with YT's silly 500 character limit, it's hard to do so and be accurate.

Eh, most of the regular posters here have posted far longer.  I'm sure you're fine in that regard.
As for YouTube, you can always post them in multiple comments, but that can get tedious and annoying, especially if they reply to you as you're in the middle of posting them, making things very hard to follow.

[Ibrahim90]

yeah, that's basically it: I feel that if I am to reply to a person on YT, I should try to keep it within a single comment. the longest I posted was just 3 comments-usually to quote someone else. putting my own points in multiple posts just increases the ease at which I can be taken out of context-by accident or quote-mining. I remember some moron who did that when I tried to explain evolution to him early on on YT. learned my lesson then and there.

and I rarely PM on there either, since If I'm to discuss a point, it should ideally be public. that way abuse is more easily caught and exposed.

[Ibrahim90]

well, I have come back from the Fail Safari, and I nabbed me a few trophies:


[yt]zCYB85TySkQ&feature=related[/yt]

now the video itself is...ok. it's not the fail per Se. after-all, O'Reilly is a piece of shit.


no, it's the comments below that are the location of the fail (I made bold the super stupid part):

America is falling behind further and further, soon China will be leading, and the Republicans are helping this development, by only saying: no more taxes, Washington is sopending too much. Just to please the people who cannot think further then one day with stupid oneliners, slowly destroying their so acclaimed "land of the free" in the process....sigh....we have pity with the ignorant Americans who cannot see this and will eventually help to turn the USA in a third world country.

yes, let us forget that the Democrats are little different, are also taking part in suppressing our freedoms (Obama did retain the Patriot act after-all), cutting taxes without cutting spending, and deploying hundreds of thousands of servicemen overseas. yeah, and while at it, let's ignore the deleterious effects of the 14.6 trillion dollar national debt we have racked up, or the high tax burden-we aren't spending too much, or taxing too much.

and yeah, this loser is European-Dutch. and yes, he's clearly a liberal or a statist. surprised?

[AnCap Dave]

I have no idea if this was posted when these videos first came out, but a few years ago dprjones did a series of videos called "Letter to America" in which he defends the NHS and universal health care.

[yt]GPNWX-aIMXk[/yt]
[yt]r4DJzOa9It4[/yt]
[yt]LSXFSQ9bJHg[/yt]
[yt]e5AXhk2WOWA[/yt]
[yt]7k6V_Gyj5xk[/yt]

He comes off rather half assed here. He defends the NHS, but at the same time claims that this debate is for Americans only. Not to mention for the most part, he is picking on Hannity, which is like picking on a child.

[Lord T Hawkeye]

[yt]SnbPgZM79rI&feature=feedu[/yt]

Skip ahead to the second letter at 5:05.

I love TotalBiscuit but he tragically falls into the same myth of "game developers make Australia wait longer for games because they're meanies."
Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm quite sure this is 100% false.  The reason why Australia waits longer for games is because they have ridiculously strict import laws and it just takes developers that long to climb Mt Bureaucracy to get past them.  Especially bad when he says they do it for money.  Really?  Withholding things from consumers makes more money?  Go ask Sega how well that worked out for them why don't you?

[Travis Retriever]

Every single word of red text in this thread:  https://www.bogosity.tv/forum/index.php?topic=890

[AnCap Dave]

I talked about this issue in my Idiot Extraordinaire thread, but after looking at more clips from Letterman, he has exceeded douchebaggery that I thought only Bill Maher could go. Bill Maher, while he did make snide jokes, didn't get anywhere NEAR as bad as Letterman did. Letterman nearly gets to the point of bullying.

[yt]99ouH2AvNxM[/yt]